In the eternal struggle against these people, who do not want to support the blessings of public broadcasting with their costs, the debt collectors had to accept a severe defeat when the 5th Civil Chamber of LG Tübingen declared illegal a seizure in the amount of 572.96 euros. The operative part of the judgment: “On appeal by the debtor, the decision of the local court of Bad Urach of 11.7.2016 is annulled and the execution of the creditor`s request for enforcement of 4.3.2015 is declared inadmissible. Find out here how you can legally cancel the broadcasting fee – in case of relocation or death. There are certainly some things we can discuss in public service broadcasting – but abolish broadcasting contributions? This is not a good idea! Here are 5 reasons why we need broadcasting contributions in Germany: Setback for contribution service: The practice of carrying out seizures like the state is not legal – because broadcasters are companies and not state authorities, says the Tübingen Regional Court. This is called “Application for exemption and authorization for social and health reasons”. There you will be guided step by step through the form. Print it at the end and attach the documents required for the evidence. You can then send both in writing to the address of the contribution service: There are some myths around the topic of midday rest. We clarify common misconceptions and answer important questions about midday rest. The Interstate Treaty on Contribution to Broadcasting has been in force for more than five years now. A broadcasting fee must be paid for each apartment. What exceptions there are and when you don`t have to pay. However, recipients of unemployment benefit II, social assistance or BAfÖG, for example, may also be exempted on request or benefit from a reduction in the contribution price.

The GEZ or audiovisual licence fee is intended to guarantee the work of the public service broadcasting through solidarity financing. The mission of public service broadcasting is to ensure a comprehensive and independent range of programmes for all citizens. It is levied per household. According to the BVerfG, the presence of receptors or the intention to use them would not matter. In the private sector, the obligation to pay the audiovisual licence fee may be linked to the ownership of apartments, since broadcasting is usually also used there. However, owners of more than one apartment should not be burdened with a total of more than one full broadcasting fee for the possibility of private use of broadcasting. [UPDATE COMPLETED] Hardly any other institution in Germany is as hated as the GEZ collectors of broadcasting companies. Even the change of GEZ`s name to the innocent word “contribution service” has not been able to change the fact that broadcasting sometimes lacks attractive programs – but never royalty refusers, opponents of GEZ and convinced doom prophets. 4. The ad-free joint productions of ARD and ZDF The broadcasting fee finances the work of public broadcasters in Germany.

These are essential for a democracy. Both contributions and taxes fall under the generic term of public charges. Taxes are cash benefits that do not constitute a counterpart to State services and are levied unconditionally to generate State revenue. Each federal state has enacted its own law on this subject. The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) is currently negotiating the legality of this funding model. The question, therefore, is not how many people suspect to what extent public service broadcasting should exist, nor whether it should be financed by a public tax. At the heart of this process is the “how” of funding, not the “if”. This is essentially a very dry legal issue, namely traditional tax law. A matter for reliable experts. The verdict reveals the contradictions with relish.

It is particularly embarrassing that Südwestrundfunk – which is the subject of this article – presents itself not as an authority, but as a modern enterprise. As a last resort, they also resort to seizures – according to their own statements, but only after the contributor has repeatedly failed to respond to the letters. How often these are such enforcement actions, institutions could not respond to the information provided by counsel. As a result, broadcasters can actively collect their debts like any other creditor – including wage garnishment and bailiffs. In fact, they have to. Institutions are legally obliged to claim unpaid contributions. The first letter from the contribution service is usually a pure data query, with which it should be specified whether the person contacted is already registered. If you ignore this and possibly follow similar letters, you will eventually receive a so-called contribution notice. In this, the contribution service informs the amount of the contribution and requests payment. If you remain passive here and do not file an objection, the decision becomes “final” in the legal sense of the term after one month. The payment of a contribution solely on the basis of the possibility of claiming a benefit for it is very close to a tax. However, unlike a tax, the ASPG cannot be arbitrarily increased or reduced.

The amount of the contribution is determined by the Commission for the purpose of determining the financial needs of broadcasting companies (KEF). The pastor of a free ecclesiastical community requested an exemption from the obligation to pay the broadcasting fee for religious reasons. His reasoning: A large part of entertainment programs present an unacceptable, impious, immoral and therefore destructive lifestyle from a biblical-Christian point of view. The Federal Constitutional Court will also negotiate the collection of contributions in the non-private sector, i.e. in the operational sector. Here, in addition to the three private plaintiffs, the car rental company Sixt appears as plaintiff. The legality of the scheme, according to which the collection of contributions is staggered according to the number of employees in a permanent establishment, will be tested. – Millionaires leave: Mink leave sinking ship The exemption applies only to the applicant. If roommates or year-round spouses live in the secondary residence, they must contact the Assessment Service. There, the obligation to pay contributions is checked.

In order to avoid this, the only option is to remove the spouse from the secondary residence. The delisting of the ZEZ had taken place under my name at that time. After that, my name was apparently removed from the obligation to pay the fee, while my wife appeared as a result of the change during the comparison with the residents` office as registered, and therefore as the remaining “liable to pay”. Maybe that`s why she was contacted, and maybe I wasn`t. Read also: Why you`d better not pay the broadcast fee in cash – and still the bailiff can threaten you. Even if you have been registered in your apartment for a long time and have not yet received a letter from the contribution service, this does not necessarily mean that you have been “forgotten” by public broadcasters: In addition to the form, you need a registration certificate from which the registration of the main residence and secondary apartments as well as the respective move-in date can be identified.

Wieso Ist Die Gez Legal